Thursday, September 1, 2011

Identity Politics and Relics

In an attempt to stay connected to current events in America one relys on podcasts, online newspapers and blogs in order to consume sweet American awseomeness. This clip from the Rachael Maddow Show was thought provoking.




Sat in the UK watching this I was forced to become reminiscent for home and my deceased grandfather.  My grandfather was somewhat of a groundbreaking individual. My grandfather was an Omega Man, he attended a Historically black Union University.  He moved to Boston in the 1930's to attend Boston University graduate school.  He was admitted to the school only to be told the quota for black students was full. Not to be deterred, he became the first black man to run a national chain grocery retail store where he employed Malcolm Little who later be known as, Malcolm X.  He was the head of the Massachusetts NAACP and Urban League successively. While head of  the NAACP he debated the Nation of Islam at Boston University, the religious groups representative was Malcolm X.  Malcolm opened the debate by stating, "Mr. Cooper, you gave me one of my first jobs, I am going to take it easy on you."

My grandfather also was the first black man to run for Mayor of Boston Massachusetts as a Republican (This was in political protest of a oppressive, Democratic party in 1950's Boston).  I remember being the only one in the family to have the honor of sitting in his chair in our livingroom.  Seated in that chair I was surrounded by copies of the Crisis, Ebony, Jet Essance Magazines as welll as the prototypical aspiring middle class badge of honour, complete sets of the western cannon.

Listening to the grown folks talk I often overheard conversations involving multiple political groups including Congressional Black Caucus.  When I was still very young, Senator Ed Brooke was the  black senator from the Massachusetts Republican party.  Political banter and critique played a major role in my childhood, actually being board to death hearint it was a clearer view into my childhood memories. Listen to Forerunner: Edward Brooke, Black Power, and White Votes.”  by historian, Dr. Jason Sokol.  (Aired: 4-17-11) here


Senator Ed Brooke

Currently in the UK, I question who among any political players at the Council level or seated in Paliment have the cultural, political and social skills to garner the over whelming support of black constituticancies.  In class struck Britian is a politiation able to speak both to the middle class and working class (although no one claims the working class moniker any longer in ol' Blighty)?  Specifically which Black politico's are able to connect to voters both ideologically and verbally.  Do all black professionals  the fear of apperaing uncooth in both general society and politics?

How does one speak to the folks in private and to the country in public?  In what ways do politicians navigate political parties and use their standing in their local communities as leveraging votes or a political party as well as having the ability to push policy that is beneficial to their constituency economically and socially.  This is a much more difficult course to navigate here in England than in America.

In The North East corridor of America identity politics used to revolve around race and ethnicity.  Big cities split recources unevenly along lines of colour, ethnicity and religion.  These lines crossed strata of class but ethnicity played a large role.  In England is class the determing factor in politicial identity? Have the English bought into the idea that this is a classless society?  We are all middle class, as we are in America, amen.  Or as current events point out is there a Janus faced outlook in Blighty?  Are divisions in society drawn between racial identity in multicultural Britian or does the spectre of class mark socitial divisions?

How does the black politition garner the public support wielded by the CBC or even President Obama?  How does a politician acrew the support of a significant percentage of the electorate?  To whom do they speak?  What do  they talk about and who do they talk to?  More importantly what obstacles are before the democratic process here in England?  A concerted effort to make the democratic process difficult for some exists in America.  With the political clout that some blacks enjoy the ghosts of the apartheid past still roam the corridors of Washington DC.



Exercising ones rights of citizenship are paramount for any democracy.  A legacy of both the tireless pursuit of civil rights as well as apathetic attitudes define the civil rights or voting rights struggle for black voters in America.  From the civil rights movement Blacks in America were able to forge a political identity and gain leverage within the system.  Like everything else that governs black identity in America the black political representative had to adopt what WEB Dubois dubbed a dual conciousness.

WEB Dubois

I am well aware of the dual conciousness psyche required of black British political players.  How can these players draw upon on England's civil rights struggles?  Or does black England need its own Harlem Renaissance or Nigritude movement?  There seems to be a need for self definition, and reckoning among blacks in England as well as greater Europe. 

I believe my exposure and induction to the world of politics was special, but perhaps not unique.  As my grandfather was active in civil discourse, England also has a legacy of black forefathers who have sacrificed for our current freedom and citizenship.  I understood that dual conciousness is a requirement for  maintaing sanity in the modern era.  The Legacy of African survival in the west also required a secure sence of self rooted in admiration for the legacy of sacrifice of my fore fathers and mothers.   This legacy pre-dates America's by centuries.  Black presence in Britain has helped to establish institutions and shape the country we love today.  It is time to celebrate ourselves, it is time to remember our black heroes from England.  It is time to remember our grandfathers.  It is time to fully celebrate our Pan-African roots, our Atlantic roots?



Is there any use for the term "Afropolitan"? - Afri-love

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Rioting in London, Black or Young?




The author of this blog in no way endorses the recent riots in London, or any public displays of violence, theft or assault.    Condolences to all who experienced any fear, intimidation or injury.  The rioting in London was hard to watch.  


This author remembers the Rodney King riots in Los Angles and witnessed the public displays of gun and gang violence of the 1990's in East Coast America.  I also am a student of American and British history.  As a knee jerk reaction, when I hear the word riot, I think Nat Turner.  Perhaps it is genetic memory, black man's paranoia or a product of my upbringing, none the less,  Nat Turner is somewhat of a folk hero among some African Americans and his violence is interpreted by many as necessary for his time.





The rioting throughout England has little in common with rioting in Hampton Roads Virginia.  The 2011 rioting in England was multicultural, wide sperad and young.  In 2011 violence between police and working class populations of Tottenham sparked violent outbursts that spread in a seemingly unrelated fashion.  Was this violence necessary in this time?  Was this violence black?   

The most recent uprisings of "urban" violence in London took place are twenty six years apart. The two London riots, the Tottenham riots in 2011 and the Broadwater Farm riots  in 1985 definitely have a few commonalities.  Both were a form of protest or unrest from a seemingly working class population of a major city.  At the heart of each was the theme of not only working class unrest, but black working class unrest.  A larger theme also appeared in the media shortly following each uncomfortable period, the concept that black, working class citizens of the city are somehow more prone to violence, looting and disorderly conduct.  


Unlike similar riots, like the Battle of Bow street, where animosity between Metropolitan Police and a multicultural, poor general public escalated the mood to high levels of hostility, the UK string of riots in 2011 was much larger in size and involved rioters who were not united by geography, ideology or cause, but they were tangentially conjoined by electronic social media.   



While looters were comprised of various ethnic, cultural, social and economic backgrounds one major theme that emerged from the upheaval, was that black citizens of urban areas are violent and in need of discipline.  The thesis involves painting urban violence as black. This is not only emerging from the more conservative media, but the left leaning, politically correct Guardian, has also given slight nods to this meme.



Note this video was published on youtube on 31, July 2011

Although Tottenham, a neighborhood within Haringey Council,  has a huge Turkish, White working class and Asian communities it seems the film makers could only find Black people seemingly aged 18 and under, fluent in London slang, innit. They even found the one Latina that lives in Tottenham who is also Bare fluent in slang, innit, bruv. My larger point is that it seems the British media is taking a page from American media in attempting to paint urban violence black, disparate, and oddly,hispanic.  


Hackney MP Dianne Abbot provided some context to her interesting perspective on the cultural environment in Tottenham, she describes a, "tinder box waiting to explode,".She explained that, "it was police-community relationships that provided the spark for the riots".  The news also seemed to repeatedly refer to operation Trident's involvement in this case.  Trident officers were in persuit of the young man killed in gun violence.  He died due to a police bullet.  The Trident connection serves as a direct link to Black and urban violence in the media. The setting was set for yet another test of resilience for multicultural Britain in the age of austerity.

While a lot has been said about austerity measures as a catalyst, I believe the rioting in Tottenham is a result of a long festering sore that exists between the working class and the first line of establishment force, the police.  Following the disruption in Tottenham, London boroughs and urban outposts in the Midlands and further points North, commenced further brand snatching and looting. 

While the connections to the seminal events in Tottenham are underreported, it is clear that a broad swathe of people across the country thought it was an opportune time to smash and grab for material goods.  The psychology of the looters became a widely discussed topic in the media.  Zoe Williams wrote a well thought commentary in the Guardian on how class and aspiration play a role in the contemplation of rioting.  This analysis echoes similar findings from The Kerner Commision.  The American commission was appointed by the Johnson administration in 1967 in response to the ongoing rioting in mostly black, mostly urban neighborhoods.  


The Kerner Commission found that America was split between a self-interested, white working class and middle class and a poor disenfranchised black underclass. These findings stated, "Our nation is moving toward two societies, one black, one white—-separate and unequal." It seems the analysis is hauntingly similar to the de facto consensus that began to emerge in Britain, there is a split between a poor disenfranchised youth and a self interested population born before 1980.  The list of negative characteristics of London rioters included economic status and race, now it included age.


When the rioting had seeming come to an end it seemed that the public, however entrenched in opposing ideology on the causes of rioting, was ready to discuss reconciliation and closure.  A large number of citizens took to the streets and organised various clean up crews via social media.  


In a sence multiculturalism was somewhat alive in Blighty.  The public was ready to heap scorn on its youth with only a slight nod towards race. Until, out of the steamy decompression of the disturbing events came a battle cry that seemingly implied, "There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it "against discrimination".  This epic rant from David Starky,


This event along with the aftermath of the rioting have made me ponder, the meaning of "black" or "blackness" in Britain.  Which elements have shaped and formed the concept of Blackness in old Blighty?







Monday, August 22, 2011

American Round up




Hello it is good to be back.  After a brief hiatus and a few riots in London, The Only African American Guy in London has returned.  Oh, I have so much to share with you.  My thoughts on the London Riots are forthcoming, I am still processing information.

In the meantime lets take a look at some Atlantic issues.  Cornell West and Travis, er, Tavis Smily are on a National Poverty tour on a posh bus.  Dr. West has a thorn in his craw about the American President and things are not going well for our beloved doctor.  Joan Walsh reports on his tiny tempa tantrums.

Next the Afri-Blog teaches us a new word, Afropolitan (that’s me) and Racialous provide a sound discussion on interracial dating in America. Enjoy.

From Joan Walsh at Salon.com

A few fair complaints about Obama drown in a sea of personal racial attacks. Is this how identity politics ends?


Cornel West's tragic meltdown - Joan Walsh - Salon.com

From the wonderful Afri-Blog


The concept of being Afropolitan, I feel like I am living it.


"Going back to the "meaning" of the word, "African" + "cosmopolitan" = "Afropolitan." Nowhere in that make-up is a specification about just where those cosmopolitan locations are."
Is there any use for the term "Afropolitan"? - Afri-love

From Racialicious, a blog about the intersection of race and pop culture. 

On Interracial Dating – The Asian Panel (1 of 3)



On Interracial Dating – The Black Panel (2 of 4)


On Interracial Dating – The Black Panel (3 of 4)



Friday, April 8, 2011

How do we Handle the Post-Modern Other in the Multicultural Era?



In the continuing chronicle of how race and conceptions of identity are malleable and so different in America and the United Kingdom I am continually astonished how such similar societies have constructed utterly different realities in the post modern era.  While it is acceptable in both countries to critique multiculturalism along the lines of religion, in the UK it is politically incorrect to critique along lines of color.  In the United States that is not the case.

In the American blog Public Policy Polling Tom Jenson posted an article entitled Barbour, Bryant lead in Mississippi.  In the article Jenson provides some insight into not only the  highly coded language of American political discourse, but also a reality check of how antiquated attitudes on race are a significant vestige of the American body politic. 

He writes,
We asked voters on this poll whether they think interracial marriage should be legal or illegal- 46% of Mississippi Republicans said it should be illegal to just 40% who think it should be legal. For the most part there aren't any huge divides in how voters view the candidates or who they support for the nomination based on their attitudes about interracial marriage but there are a few exceptions.


I would even venture to speculate that the reported attitude on race would hold true for both blacks and whites in Mississippi.  However far right politics is riddled with coded language on race and supporters seem to cluster around candidates and policy that support socially conservative or racially conservative ideology.  Jenson continues to state,


[Sarah]Palin's net favorability with folks who think interracial marriage should be illegal (+55 at 74/19) is 17 points higher than it is with folks who think interracial marriage should be legal (+38 at 64/26.) Meanwhile Romney's favorability numbers see the opposite trend. He's at +23 (53/30) with voters who think interracial marriage should be legal but 19 points worse at +4 (44/40) with those who think it should be illegal. Tells you something about the kinds of folks who like each of those candidates.


I would contend that the Cloward-Piven conspiracy crowd would rally around Palin supporters and the racially conservative.  There has been a recycling of far right John Birtch Society style ideology in mainstream political discourse, High profile candidates like Palin who ride the crest of lassie faire media ethics and practice, give new life to the ghosts of conservative racial ideology. 
Web 2.0 fueled reader comments may or may not tell a different story of exorcism of evil spirits. 




Rosie Q said...




It's a question that shouldn't HAVE to be asked. But clearly, there is a need to expose the truth about these so called "small government" hypocrites.
Zack,

The poll covered the legality of marriage, not dating. I could not immediately find data via Google that was specific to Mississippi or to Democrats, but regional data for the South (Altman & Klinker*) indicates that, even ten years ago, 86% of whites and 98% of non-whites supported legal interracial marriage. If that's representative of MS, too, and only 40% of MS 'Pubicans support it, ISTM the percentage of Dem supporters probably approaches 85-90%. Which makes it uninformative to poll it.

What's your point?

*http://maltman.hmdc.harvard.edu/papers/MeasuringRacialDiffs.pdf


Dustin Ingalls said...




BTW, we did ask this interracial marriage question of everyone, not just Republicans, but we'll be releasing the full results on that at a later date.


Anonymous said...




UNETHICAL POLLING. This is a cynical poll conducted by a Democratic polling organization to smear the Republican Party. PPP asked this poll with motive and knowing the response they would get. Democratic operatives will use this poll to frame a racial narrative to the upcoming election and scare minority voters and urban educated voters away from the GOP. It's pure cynical politics.

Monday, March 14, 2011

Black consciousness (South Africa): The debate starts

From the self proclaimed, "unashamedly elitist website", The Daily MaverickSipho Hlongwane offers his perspective on black  consciousness, a South African perspective.  He questions how social justice brings the debate on consciousness to the fore.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Happy Independence Day

Tuggstar the Poet:

Happy Independence day Ghana.  Please construct your own meaning in the post-colonial, global era.

Monday, February 28, 2011

Fear and Hope in the UK


Searchlight Educational Trust commissioned the polling organisation Populus to explore the issues of English identity, faith and race. TheFear and HOPE survey gives a snapshot of current attitudes in society today. It explores the level of fear, hate and hope. It details what pulls us apart and what brings us together. With 5,054 respondents and 91 questions it is one of the largest and most comprehensive surveys into attitude, identity and extremism in the UK to date.


Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Thursday, January 20, 2011

The Elephant In the Room Post Update



Further updates to the update....... Frances Piven is tough.  From NANCY GOLDSTEIN at the american Prospect.



Update to the update:





Spotlight From Glenn Beck Brings a CUNY Professor Threats

and from the excellent blog "We are are respectable Negroes",




Glenn Beck continues to rattle on about Frances Piven.  The coded language, thinly veiled bigotry and class-ism is palpable.   See the original Elephant in the Room post below for further clarification on the Cloward–Piven strategy. 


P.S.
The linked video from youtube contains wing-nut banter

Getting to the seminal point



The Huffington Post described the above comments as "eye brow raising".   Beyond eyebrow raising Rick Santorum's comment,

"Well if that human life is not a person then I find it almost remarkable for a black man to say 'now we are going to decide who are people and who are not people.'"


This comment is indicative of a deeper psychological rift that has bifurcated the American psyche.  The chasm exists between Americans who are willing to have a person of color leading their country and those who tightly cling to a vestigial white supremacist ideology.  Santorum's unveiled bigotry serves as dog whistle politics for many on the right who trade in the politics of fear.  However, the brand of fear Santourum is peddling is white supremacy.  


The comment is forked.  On one prong, Rick states that, "it is remarkable for a black man to say WE are going to decide who are people."..  Left tacit in that phrase is the concept that black people are not human.  This is a founding theme in the American apartheid system.  The 3/5 compromise was not only a canard for census data but it is also a pillar of racist ideology, it promotes the idea that Africans do not have the stature, intellect or indeed the characteristics of human beings.  The other prong is the personal pronoun we, it connotes a group of people in America who are fundamentally unlike the standing President of the United States.  This has been a theme of the right, The President is not like "us" or "we" or "we want our country back".  Again Rick is alluding to the fact that Barak Obama does not have two white parents and is not of the social or perhaps mental status of the unnamed "we". This group of individuals called we is a group Santourum seemingly claims membership of.  Is this a social group or a cultural group?  


Clearly Santourum is borrowing a page from politics from past centuries, sadly much of the critique from the right revolves around the politics of bigotry.  Santourum likely understands and supports the ignorance of his message.


Perhaps Elon James White frames the discourse more effectively  
Video Update:


Friday, December 31, 2010

The Power of Nightmares

Continuing with the Adam Curtis cavalcade of video, The Power of Nightmares, subtitled The Rise of the Politics of Fear, is a BBC documentary film series; the films compare the rise of the Neo-Conservative movement in the United States and the radical Islamist movement, making comparisons on their origins and claiming similarities between the two. Take note of the role of Frantz Fannon. (Ilink; http://tinyurl.com/24nzrxr)




Wednesday, December 22, 2010

A reason for leaks.....?

The Rise and fall of Tee Vee Journalism........  Adam Curtis



link: http://tinyurl.com/3xrxx8y


A funny but sadly true update...
From Gawker



Monday, December 13, 2010

The Elephant In the Room



Article Review:





What makes a statement like the following plausible in America and not in the United Kingdom?

It was Cloward and Piven's article that gave ACORN the idea to start peddling subprime mortgages to poor minorities in the 1980s, knowingly laying the groundwork for a global economic meltdown nearly thirty years later.

The movement of the new right in America differs greatly from the resurgence of the new right in The United Kingdom.  While The Conservatives in England have molded the new Tory from Canadian, compassionate conservatism and American image crafting, the American conservatives have chosen a path of disinformation and fear.  The new Torys have also partnered with The Liberal Democratic party to form a collation government in England.  In stark contrast to their British colleagues, The Republican Party aligned with various Tea party organisations,  have returned to the “southern strategy” that was responsible for the defection of the Dixiecrats of years past.

The southern strategy was born under Nixon to recruit southern supporters of segregation. Disillusioned by the eras civil  rights acts Dixiecrats shifted republican. Republicans under Regan with his “welfare queens” quote  perfected its implementation and it continued to even haunt John MCcain in his GOP primary run against George W. Bush.

This article, helps to explain why race is still the elephant in the room in American politics.
link->

Post Update:

Glenn Beck Targets Frances Fox Piven




The Spin: